"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.
The SIQ for this article will be revealed
neer's classification, radiological union, constant score, philos, proximal humerus fracture
Prabhu Ethiraj, Sagar Venkataraman, Karthik S J , Arun H. Shanthappa, Sandesh Agarawal
Cite this article as: Ethiraj P, Venkataraman S, S J K, et al. (June 30, 2022) Does Proximal Humerus Inter Locking System (PHILOS) Plating Provide a Good Functional Outcome in Proximal Humerus Fractures?. Cureus 14(6): e26474. doi:10.7759/cureus.26474
There is still a lot of controversy and ambiguity, and no single therapy regimen or strategy for proximal humerus fractures has been proved to be uniformly helpful. According to estimates, only about 20% of proximal humeral fractures require surgery. This study aims at evaluating the functional outcome of treatment of Proximal humerus fractures with PHILOS (Proximal Humerus Inter Locking System) plating using Constant score and assessing the duration for fracture union by follow-up x-rays.
This is a retrospective study on patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedics attached to a tertiary hospital in Kolar from January 2017 to January 2020. After meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, 40 patients were included in this study. All the patients underwent PHILOS plating after the pre-anesthetic check-up. The patients were regularly followed up, the functional outcome was assessed using the Constant Murley score, and the fracture union was assessed radiologically by follow-up x-rays.
The mean age of our forty patients was 46.8 (20-70), with a male: female ratio of 2.3:1. Fractures united at an average of 13.75 weeks. The functional outcome was found to be excellent in 2 patients (5%), good in 22 patients (55%), fair in 7 patients (17.5%), and poor in 9 patients (22.5%). The Constant mean score achieved was 68.75±14.03. The mean time of fracture union was 13.75 weeks. The constant score was compared between variables like age groups, sex, fracture pattern, and mode of injury, but the values were statistically insignificant.
Even in individuals with osteopenic bones, we achieved excellent to good fracture repair in most cases. The locking plate provides adequate fracture stability and facilitates early shoulder mobilization without hindering fracture union.
There is still a lot of controversy and ambiguity, and no single therapy regimen or strategy for proximal humerus fractures has been proved to be uniformly helpful. Surgical treatment is rarely necessary because proximal humeral fractures are rarely displaced or angulated. According to estimates, only about 20% of proximal humeral fractures require surgery [1]. The need to treat such a fracture is determined by the fracture pattern, bone quality, and the patient's age and activity level [2]. The aim is to achieve stability and near-anatomical reduction as soon as conceivable so that mobilization can commence. The humeral head, greater tuberosity, lesser tuberosity, and proximal shaft are all involved in the proximal humerus fractures. Proximal humerus fractures account for about 4% of all fractures and 26% of all humerus fractures, and it usually affects people older than 65 years.
Due to the dislocation position and the patients' age, these fractures continue to complicate the surgeon. It can be treated with either surgical or conservative approaches, and the degree of displacement and angulation of fracture fragments determine which of the two procedures is used. Furthermore, because age is a major factor influencing management decisions, several complications arise in the functional approach. Osteoporotic bone, angular instability, implant impingement, bone loss, loss of reduction, and screw backing are frequent difficulties seen after the operative procedure of proximal humerus fractures [3,4].
20% of proximal humerus fractures necessitate surgery, and the Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS) has become the most often utilized treatment method. The incidence of proximal humerus fracture is more significant among the younger generation than the elderly cases [5]. This study aims to evaluate the functional outcome of Proximal humerus fractures treated with PHILOS plating using a Constant score and assess the fracture union duration by follow-up x-rays.
This is a retrospective study on patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedics attached to a tertiary hospital in Kolar from January 2017 to January 2020. The Institutional Ethical Committee of Sri Devaraj Urs medical college approved the study with approval no- DMC/KLR/IEC/366/2021-22.
Patients more than 18 years of age who presented with acute displaced proximal humerus fractures and underwent a Proximal Humerus Interlocking System were included in the study. Pathological fracture, an association of fracture of ipsilateral scapula or clavicle, an association of pre-injury shoulder pathology, and an association of neurovascular injury were excluded. A total of 40 patients were included in this study. After routine OT profile investigations and pre-anesthetic check-ups, written and informed consent was taken from all the patients.
The patients underwent surgery in a beach chair position under general anesthesia. Delto's pectoral approach was used for all the patients. Postoperatively shoulder arm pouch was advised for the patients, and six doses of antibiotics were given.
Starting at the coracoid process, an 8 cm to 10 cm incision was performed along the course of the deltopectoral groove. The inter-nervous planes of the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles were identified and separated. Depending on the exposure, the cephalic vein was retracted medially or laterally. External rotation was employed to tense the subscapular muscle, incised along the fibers' course. The fracture's remnants were identified, and the hematoma was removed [6]. Tag sutures were put in the rotator cuff muscles, which would be removed later.
K wires were used to make a preliminary reduction, confirmed in both orthogonal views. The PHILOS plate was placed 5-8 mm posterior to the bicipital groove and 2-4 mm distal to the larger tuberosity. Using the woodpecker technique, the plate was first fastened to the distal fragment, and screws were inserted into the head [7,8].
An immediate check x-ray was obtained to evaluate the alignment of the bones and confirm that the reduction was ideal. On the first post-operative day, passive shoulder mobilization began. On the fourteenth day, the wound was inspected, and the staples were removed. Active shoulder mobilization was started after two weeks. The Constant Murley shoulder score was used to assess functional ability.
Four-week, six-week, three-month, and subsequent follow-ups were conducted. The Murley shoulder score was rated as poor (0-55), moderate (56-70), good (71-85), and excellent (86-100). At each follow-up, radiographs were collected to assess fracture union, and any complications such as fracture displacement, loss of reduction, varus, and valgus angulation were noted. Backing out of the screw, plate breakage/pull-out, malunion, nonunion, or avascular necrosis of the humeral head were all failures.
The mean age of our forty patients was 46.8 (20-70), with a female: male ratio of 1:2.3. Twenty-seven patients belonging to the more than 45 age group suggested a strong relation of proximal humerus osteoporosis, which is age-related. The majority of patients were injured as a result of a traffic collision (70%), followed by a fall from a height (17.5%) and other reasons (12.5 percent ). Thirty cases involved the dominant side (75%). Eight patients had 1 part fracture (20%), 14 (35%) had 2-part fractures, 14 (35%) had 3-part fractures, and four (10%) had 4-part fractures, according to Neer. The description of the study participants is summarised in Table 1.
Fractures united at an average of 13.75 weeks. The functional outcome was excellent in 2 patients (5%), good in 22 patients (55%), fair in 7 patients (17.5%), and poor in 9 patients (22.5%). The Constant mean score achieved was 68.75±14.03. We found that Neer type I fractures had the highest Constant scores, 71.62±11.68. A comparison of the fracture type and Constant score is summarised in Table 2. However, the p-value was insignificant for the fracture type and the constant score (0.905).
Four patients developed a superficial infection treated with antibiotics, and one had developed stiffness of the shoulder joint. Five patients developed implant failure, including avascular necrosis in 3 patients (7.5%) and screwed back out in 2 patients (5%). The complications are listed in table 3.
The constant score was compared between different variables like age groups, sex, fracture pattern, and mode of injury but the values were statistically insignificant (Table 4).
The mean time of fracture union was 13.75 weeks. A comparison of fracture union with Constant score was summarized in Table 5, but the results were statistically insignificant (p-value - 0.263).
Mean (SD): Fracture union in weeks
Most proximal humeral fractures require conservative treatment. Percutaneous pinning, intramedullary fixation, interfragmentary fixation with sutures, and hemiarthroplasties are some of the surgical options for proximal humeral fractures. Adopting less intrusive fracture reduction and fixation methods has become popular in recent years. The less invasive the treatment, the more operating requirements are required, such as 1) strong bone stock, 2) minimum tuberosity comminution, 3) patient willingness to participate in post-operative physiotherapy regimens, and 4) advanced surgical abilities [9,10].
The use of PHILOS plates and screws to fix proximal humeral fractures has been linked to problems such as subacromial impingement, screw pull-out in osteoporotic bone, and avascular necrosis due to severe periosteal stripping. The use of T-buttress plates in fixing proximal humeral fractures has been linked to a significant rate of fixation failure, according to Kristiansen and Christensen [11]. Wijgman et al. [12] found that 87 percent of patients with three- and four-part fractures treated with T-buttress plates had good intermediate and long-term results. The participants in their study had an average age of 48 years.
Fractures of the Proximal humerus have lately been treated with novel implants such as the plan tan humerus fixator plate, Polaris nail, and PHILOS plate. Two cancellous compression screws in the head of the humerus are combined with a plate on the shaft of the humerus to form the humerus fixator plate. According to Sadowski et al. [13], the use of this device in older patients results in a 100% failure rate. Polaris nails have been demonstrated to be effective in both older and younger patients with 2 part fractures.
This study did not assess definitive osteopenia by testing bone mineral density or using a Z score. However, trivial trauma resulting in proximal humerus fractures is more seen in the age group more than 45 years.
In this work, a new surgical strategy for the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures was presented. It combines the ideas of traditional plate fixation with the principles of locking screws. For the proximal humerus, the plate is pre-shaped and contoured [14]. The advantages of this implant include the improved purchase in osteopenic bone, no loss of reduction or varus/valgus angulations, and angular and axial stability of the construct provided by the locking screws in the plate. We obtained preliminary results in terms of functional outcomes using locking plates. The procedure's main technically problematic part is acquiring the correct version of the humerus for proper plate positioning. We had some impingement concerns with the early sample of patients due to the relatively newer implant and the novel technique used. Because this plate does not affect the envelope of the soft tissue, it causes less injury to the vascular supply of the fracture, lowering the likelihood of osteonecrosis [15].
Another difficult element is avoiding impingement of the plate's top on the acromion by putting it very proximal to the humerus. A K wire put through an opening on the top of the plate, which should be in line with the tip of the greater tuberosity, can be used to prevent this. It is done when the plate is initially positioned. Incorrect positioning of the diverging screws in the humeral head might also result from placing the plate too high. When using proximal interlocking screws, be careful not to penetrate the head and cause chondrolysis [16].
The main limitation of this study is less follow-up period and a lack of a control group. It is a single-center study, and patient characteristics are not evaluated in this study as they might lead to implant failure. The risk factors such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, or inherent bony disorders were not analyzed in this retrospective study. Definitive osteopenia was not assessed in this study by testing bone mineral density. This study deals only with the functional outcome of managing proximal humerus fractures with PHILOS plating. However, further studies are required to compare the outcomes of various modes of management of proximal humerus fractures and assess the outcomes in definitive osteopenic bones.
One part fracture has a better functional outcome when compared with other types of fractures. Proximal humerus fractures are more common in males and strongly correlate with osteoporotic bones. The locking plate, we feel, provides adequate fracture stability and facilitates early shoulder mobilization without jeopardizing fracture union. The use of the PHILOS plate as a surgical alternative in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures is something we would suggest.
Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND
Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND
Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND
Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND
Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar issued approval DMC/KLR/IEC/366/2021-22. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Ethiraj P, Venkataraman S, S J K, et al. (June 30, 2022) Does Proximal Humerus Inter Locking System (PHILOS) Plating Provide a Good Functional Outcome in Proximal Humerus Fractures?. Cureus 14(6): e26474. doi:10.7759/cureus.26474
Peer review began: May 16, 2022 Peer review concluded: June 10, 2022 Published: June 30, 2022
© Copyright 2022 Ethiraj et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
RTA- road traffic accident
Mean (SD): Fracture union in weeks
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.
This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.
Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
Already have an account? Sign in.
Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.
By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.